Then we'll learn stuff. And growers will learn to name their geology, rather than revert to the dumb District numbers currently used by those not fluent in the names of the numerous geological groups. I'm tired of hearing well-intentioned growers say stuff like "I'm in the corner of eleven, but I've got some thirteen and six."
15 February 2017
McLAREN VALE TASTES ITS DIRT
all tasting photos©Philip White
Licking the 2016 rocks for science
by PHILIP WHITE
While its maceration still
confounds me as it growls around my mind, the McLaren Vale Districts Tasting
of barrels of one-year-old Shiraz left a few prominent, and I reckon fairly trustworthy, presumptions.
That's probably
presumptuous. Let's forget that. We'll call 'em suspicions worth pursuit.
This annual event is where
a group of bright McLaren Vale winemakers sit around examining flights of
Shiraz deliberately made according to their source terroirs, stored in neutral
aged oak for a year, decanted into a bottle and presented.
This is a full-bore
forensic tasting conducted by local experts fluent in the most complex aspects
of their region's unique terroir and history. I had a couple of years away from
the table and it was a delight to be back there in that fruity-yet-crisp
intellectual and organoleptic atmosphere. The table bristles like a chess
championship, or a Miles Davis rehearsal.
Everyone gets their solo.
The trick is not to go
fault-hunting. The appraisal nerves here are most useful wrapped entirely
around the matter of whether or not the wines in each subgroup share component
factors. If they do, what are they? If they don't, why not? What else do they
offer?
Every year, the collective
findings of these tasters vary. Some vintages I've seen one geological group or
another dominate in individual character or quality; some years it seems almost
every geology shows unique distinction, for better or worse.
The individual shards of
memory and notes of this tasting won't be of much use scientifically until
they're added to the database built from all these vintages of annual
appraisals and countless hours of discussion through each year.
Wes Pearson, who slides
comfortably down the razor blade between the Dodgy Brothers, his winemaking
partnership, and his other life as a scientist at the Wine Research Institute
ran the tasting in a methodical and reassuring way. In an operation which can suddenly
seem overwhelmingly complex, it's good to feel reassured as you progress.
First, all the wines were
brought in by makers who pin-pointed their source on the Geology of the McLaren Vale Wine Region* map of 2010. A committee,
including some of these expert tasters, has been working to establish a series
of sub-regional compartments based on geology and often a more complex
discussion of aspect and climate and other critical influences on the tricky
bits.
They call these
sub-regions Districts. They are not recognised in any law, but are tentative
sub-regional boundaries for agricultural, geological, organoleptic, œnological and
viticultural study. It's about science, not marketing. It's nascent science.
First up, whilst the
60-odd entries were poured in 11 flights, we first tasted blends of all the
wines from each district. These we discussed intensely. Equal proportions of
each entrant from a particular district would be blended and poured, then pored
over.
Next, district by
district, we examined the individual components, always then reflecting on the
vineyard's geology and site. If, say, one component turned out to dominate its district's assemblage, the tasters can form an idea of that spot's general trend by removing the dominator. Sometimes there were only three or four wines, so
one treads with great sensitivity. Other districts had many more entries.
There are a couple of
possible trends that fascinate me most this early in the piece.
First, I felt the 2016
vintage may have been outstanding for the way in which the year and its
conditions overwhelmed many abiding suspicions and presumptions I'd had about
geology. The boundaries were a little smudged this year. Like overall, these
were elegant, racy wines without so much of the fat the local runners can put
on so easily.
I certainly had my
favourites, but to me, the lithe style of the year seemed to overwhelm a lot of
the geological hints I'd expected.
Otherwise, there could be
a shot of subconscious industrial psychological stuff going here where the
winemakers quietly and probably independently decide to show a bit more
attention to letting their grounds speak by pursuing a more elegant style for
the barrel they set aside for this remarkable exercise.
You get a fashion drift
like that now and then.
If in this instance, the
vintage has magnified their focus, making the goal closer and more easily
attained, that's very cool.
If it's only a
viticultural fashion or accounting thing, I hope there's some science to it.
To my burnished saxaphone,
one geological base totally distinctive in 2016 was the calcereous Eocene (young at
56-34 million years) geology of the Blanche Point formation, which reappears in
various locations spread kilometres apart. These old seabeds almost invariably
dinged up a tab of descriptors more akin to a ripe and juicy young Coonawarra.
In this case, geology seems to overwhelm vintage.
Please don't begin to
think these reflections of mine will suddenly change your eventual bottle of
McLaren Vale: this was merely 60 trial barrels out of the region's 3,218
hectares of Shiraz. There will be many more woody, and probably many a bit like
this eventually assembled from each cellar's stack. But there's plenty of time left
for polishing. The blenders have not touched these wines.
Which is what makes them
special.
Neither does this tasting
have anything to do with the so-called Scarce Earths Shiraz marketing scheme,
which obviously causes great confusion to those being introduced to this
project.
Consider the unpronouncable
Scarce Earths, which in China translates to Rare Earths, which are a set of
glowing beauties on the Periodic Table. They're used in stuff like warheads, TV screens and
phone batteries and China's probably got most of it waiting to be mined. See
how easy I get off the track ... but his is really very confusing, especially to the Chinese!
I set out to say that until they hire a poet or writer to come up with a better name than this smart-arsed Rare Earths/Scarce Earths nonsense Chester Osborne invented, the committees of good folk
who've spent years on these studies could help individual local growers confirm
their geology so they could sell that vineyard's wine under the region's
special seal to guarantee that geology is exactly what the label claims, whatever the variety.
Then we'll learn stuff. And growers will learn to name their geology, rather than revert to the dumb District numbers currently used by those not fluent in the names of the numerous geological groups. I'm tired of hearing well-intentioned growers say stuff like "I'm in the corner of eleven, but I've got some thirteen and six."
Then we'll learn stuff. And growers will learn to name their geology, rather than revert to the dumb District numbers currently used by those not fluent in the names of the numerous geological groups. I'm tired of hearing well-intentioned growers say stuff like "I'm in the corner of eleven, but I've got some thirteen and six."
If such an advancement could be made, our map would make a lot more sense to many more people, including savvy customers. There'd also be a more
inclusive and varied stable presented from across the vignoble: one which
includes all the new varieties being planted by pioneers and adventurers who
deserve as much recognition as the old couch potaters.
*Geology of the McLaren Vale Wine Region, PIRSAMinerals and Energy Resources South Australia Publishing Services©Government of
South Australia June 2010
I'd love to see an overlay on our geology map, indicating the price grapes bring per hectare ... this would immediately begin to indicate the geologies winemakers prefer, and maybe begin to discourage vignerons from planting in the less-appropriate districts.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
What a good thing Whitey! So what's Croser going to do with our $5.3 million researching Shitaz terroir? Looks like it should be divided up as seed funding so all major Shiraz regions can start sorting their geology I reckon.
It looks like an earthquake rock and rolled through the winery here ... also note, geologists tend to have a minimum of 5 pockets filled with crap, can't help ourselves ... I always wash my hand lens in my pocket - hear the washing machine going clackers and there it is. Never broken though!
How many millions of dollars did you get to do this?
All voluntary, Chuck.
Your far too polite Whitey. That is too much leaf your tasting in the 16s Bad vine managing.Lazy bastards
Post a Comment