“Sod the wine, I want to suck on the writing. This man White is an instinctive writer, bloody rare to find one who actually pulls it off, as in still gets a meaning across with concision. Sharp arbitrage of speed and risk, closest thing I can think of to Cicero’s ‘motus continuum animi.’

Probably takes a drink or two to connect like that: he literally paints his senses on the page.”


DBC Pierre (Vernon God Little, Ludmila’s Broken English, Lights Out In Wonderland ... Winner: Booker prize; Whitbread prize; Bollinger Wodehouse Everyman prize; James Joyce Award from the Literary & Historical Society of University College Dublin)


.

.

.

.

12 November 2008

Good Year For Feathers







by PHILIP WHITE – This was published in The Sydney Review in 1990


Now I’ve become a city slicker I shall miss the muck of vintage. It infects the lives of everyone in some necks of the woods, neo-Dionysians and Primitive Baptists alike.


I lived for a while in the arid badlands north east of the Barossa. Dutton was a dry ghost town perched on the side of the last hill before the land swept down to the endless Mallee flats. Well, it looked like a ghost town. Most of the cottages had people in them, but there was no shop and you never saw anybody. The most recent ghosts were the souls of the poor kids the Truro Murderers buried down on those vast flats around Stonefield. Vintage even affected us there.


If you drove east from my hut, down the slope and off across the flat lands toward your Gilded Palace of Sin on the east coast, the first real hill you’d strike had the Hydro Majestic Hotel sitting on its top, and that’s a bloody long way away.


Most of Australia’s grapes are grown between those two hills.


I lived perched there on my hill, halfway between the Barossa Valley, which doesn’t really look like a valley, and the Murray Valley, which looks even less like a valley. In fact, it’s all the flat land between my hill and yours, fourteen hundred bloody kilometres away. Every damned truck of grapes or must or wine or bottles that sang from one place to the other spread my little joint with a layer of fine red dust.


The starlings always told me when harvest was nigh. A few weeks before any of the first grapes were ready the starlings would call in at my birdbath. It was the only water for thirty kays. They’d muscle the grass parrots aside and spray the feed dish with grape pips. It must have been terribly uncomfortable for the poor little bastards, flying all that way with their bellies tight with green grapes. The nearest vineyard was at least as far away as the nearest water. They would have been busting for a drink as well as an evacuation of their little gizzards by the time they got to me.


The birdies could also be relied upon to signal the beginning of harvest. The roar of the trucks would gradually build up and suddenly, instead of carrying rocks or tractors or oranges or ready-made houses they’d be chock full of the earliest vintage pickings. Even ordinary tip trucks get in on the act. The drivers glue their tailgates shut with giant tubes of stuff they call Gorilla Snot.


Mechanically harvested grapes bear little resemblance to the pleasant peasant basketsful that winery propagandists have preferred we consider down through the ages. The machines literally bash the fruit from their vines, so not only do the bunches shred, but the berries are torn separate and they leak their juice so by the time the tip truck has covered the two hours of dirt road between the River and my place the top layer of its cargo is caked in road dust and the bottom half of the tray is awash with browning juice and regardless of the strength of that Gorilla Snot the tailgates leak. So the roads get sticky with fermenting grape juice which attracts most of the insects in the world which attract most of the birds in the world which get so heady and confident there in their terrible feeding frenzy they tend to get squashed by the next truck. So you can tell when harvest has commenced by the feathers on the roads.


This happens too during the grain harvest. The roads are sticky with dead galahs, and their broken wings signal sadly as you drive by, pink and grey, pink and grey. Once your road has acquired a good layer of grain or insects eating carcases, the carrion birds get in on the act to pig out on the flesh of those who’ve gone before, and they get squashed, too. So there in the beautiful array of grass parrot, rosella and galah feathers you start to get the jet black of the raven, the speckled khaki of the prey birds and some white from the odd maggie and the whole thing makes driving a lot more interesting. Unless you’re on a motorbike, when it becomes lethal. You either end up plucking a drunken hysterical cocky from your visor and face, or slip in the guts of the fallen and catch a painful case of gravel rash mixed with feathers and bird guts and the first wine of the year. There are better ways of ingesting it.


Silly things happen to the trucks, too. A few years back a brace of them were struggling up my hill, their tanks filled with freshly-crushed Murray Valley must. They weren’t chilled tankers. The day was hotter than expected and the trip took longer than they’d planned, and by the time they’d got to my place their must was fermenting vigorously. Half way up the slope the first one blew its top and released a geyser of two or three tonnes of bright purple juice, skins and pips. The second fellow drove straight into this, lost vision, lost traction, and slid gracefully over the edge into a paddock, spilling his fizzy burden into the same thirsty dust. Very absorbent place, Australia.


There are dark little pubs like the Snakepit, undefiled by tourists, where drivers of these trucks see to their thirst and it’s always a delight to join them in their work. You hear the fair dinkum wine industry news, like which Barossa winery is making wine from concentrated apple juice; or which one’s selling Murray Valley plonk to the Hunter, pretending it’s Barossa. Or the one about the rookie with the shiny new tanker. He backed into the winery, sucked out his load of booze with a big mono pump, and looked around at the critical moment to see the whole damn tanker crumple up like Alfoil because he’d forgotten to open the aircocks at the top and that thirsty big pump turned his new truck into one enormous vacuum.


If you’re particularly good to them, these drovers of the long wine paddock will even arrange samples for you, so the strategically-placed critic can get to taste much of the Hunter vintage before the Hunter winemakers do.


It’s a pity that this year I won’t be able to keep you informed. But then again, the call of the wine road is strong, the Snakepit is dim, quiet and cool, and there are a million avian souls to toast.

.


11 November 2008

GOTCHA! From The University's Own Paper




Vice-Chancellor Professor Mary O'Kane pictured at Glenthorne with the Chairman of the Friends of Glenthorne, Peter Smytherman. Photo: John Drislane.




Vineyard planned in Glenthorne Farm handover


From Adelaidean - Volume 10 Number 6 - News from Adelaide University - July 2001

GLENTHORNE Farm — the former CSIRO property at O’Halloran Hill in Adelaide’s southern suburbs — is being handed over to Adelaide University by the State Government for use as a vineyard and wine research facility.


The 200 hectare property was bought by the State Government from the Commonwealth in 1998 after it had been vacated by the CSIRO’s Division of Health and Human Nutrition.


Welcoming the decision, Adelaide University’s Vice-Chancellor, Professor Mary O’Kane, said the University had agreed to establish a commercial vineyard at Glenthorne in partnership with BRL Hardy.


“The partnership agreement between the University and BRL Hardy—two of the icons of the South Australian wine industry—will strengthen South Australia’s position as an international leader in wine research and education,” she said.


“This is a strategic, long-term investment based on sound financial principles and an assessment of the future needs of the Australian wine industry.


“In addition to state-of-the-art laboratories and equipment at the Waite campus, the University will now have access to a large commercial vineyard managed by one of the world’s fastest-growing wine companies. This will be a tremendous advantage in ensuring that the University and the South Australian wine industry stay at the forefront of viticulture and oenology research and education.”


Professor O’Kane said most of the land would be put under vines and some research facilities would also be located on the site.


The commercial vineyard would contribute further money for research at the University.


“We expect that the vineyard will begin to generate income for research from the third vintage,” Professor O’Kane said.


“We have entered into a long-term contract with BRL Hardy for the management of the vineyard and sale of the fruit, more than 50% of which will be available to other winemakers.”


Mr Angus Kennedy, BRL Hardy’s Operational and Technical Director, said the vineyard development would benefit the entire South Australian wine industry.


“This initiative is effective in that a number of parties will benefit from the project over a number of years. We are looking forward to working closely with Adelaide University for the betterment of the South Australian wine industry,” he said.


Professor O’Kane commended the State Government, the Commonwealth and the CSIRO on working together to produce an agreement on Glenthorne Farm that would deliver long-term economic benefits to the State.


She also paid tribute to the University’s Deputy Chancellor, vigneron and Executive Chairman of Petaluma Ltd, Mr Brian Croser, for his role in negotiating a new future for Glenthorne.


Professor O’Kane said the University was aware of local residents’ concerns about the future of the property and would be consulting with them about the vineyard plans.


“We are seeking planning approval for the vineyard, which will include an extensive buffer zone around the site,” she said.


“We will be working closely with BRL Hardy to minimise noise and inconvenience to the local community. BRL Hardy has extensive experience in developing and operating vineyards in an urban environment, and we will be making available the University’s full research resources to ensure responsible environmental management of the site.”

.


Glenthorne War Hots Up




Glenthorne Farm: the houses are coming over the hill - PHOTO: Leo Davis


The following letters were published in The Messenger Press on 5 November 2008


Deed excludes urban development


Citizens, never succumb to the bullying of the University of Adelaide.


Look at Glenthorne Farm. Seven short years ago, the University made a solemn vow to use this priceless land for agriculture, horticulture, viticulture, winemaking, community recreation, research, and education. The whole deal was dependent upon the University never using the land for any other purpose. The deed it signed repeatedly forbids any urban development. The University cannot even “seek to undertake development” without written approval from the minister. The deed repeatedly, precisely “excludes urban development”. It says urban development “will not be approved”.


With the help of Senator Robert Hill, the late Greg Trott engineered this land transfer with the government, the CSIRO and the University. Trott envisaged revegetated headlands and creeklines and the investigation of drought-resistant grape varieties and organic and biodynamic minimal irrigation viticulture.


The University now says it can’t do this because there’s no water. Don’t they know what drought means?

They obviously hope to get the water for their 1,000 new houses from the reservoir across the road, or the desal plant pipe that Water SA is currently trying to push through Glenthorne. They seem unaware that 40% of McLaren Vale’s vineyards depend upon recycled water from housing, and that the figure’s increasing rapidly.


In its pompous claims about its far-sighted understanding of climate change, the University fails to address the biggest issue facing this state: the River. If its almighty wine college had kept ahead of issues of drought, climate change and stupid irrigation-dependent viticulture in the wrong places, the wine industry would be in much better shape, and the Murray might still be a river.


Now, the University wants us to believe that it will sign a solemn agreement to guarantee the money it gets from its housing development will be spent, over the next century, on reforesting the Mount Lofty Ranges.


Of what value is a document signed by this University?


PHILIP WHITE


Appalling farm plan

I’m appalled at the University of Adelaide’s decision to promote housing developments at Glenthorne.

Is it appropriate that the guilt of 150 years of land degradation be passed onto a few southern suburb residents by suggesting that ``if this project does not go ahead then we are basically accepting species extinction’’?

Seriously, is this research centre and 100ha of revegetation the crucial difference between survival and extinction for species?

And where does it get the figure for revegetation of 150,000ha from this money? Who’d be willing to give up 150,000ha of land for just under $66 a hectare - I’m sorry that is just plain rubbish.

Dr Paton also seems to believe that no one is doing any suitable revegetation, anywhere, ever!

What a slap in the face to all the hard-working volunteer groups I’ve worked with which do a great job with what’s available to them.

If this research is so crucial why does Glenthorne have to be sold?

It represents a chance to re-establish 200ha of a Commonwealth-listed endangered grey box woodland now that sounds more like a legacy and something to be proud of.

This proposal is arrogance of the highest degree. Where else in the world could you have land purchased by the government, for $7 million, sold to the university for $1 to be kept forever as open space for southern residents, then sold for a $999,999 dollar profit? Absurd.

Dr Paton’s vision of a woodland recovery centre is unfortunately muddying the waters.

No one denies the environment is suffering - personally I’ve spent my life and career working to conserve endangered plants - but to use an overused cliché: You can put lipstick on this pig, but it’s still a pig.

JERRY SMITH


03 November 2008

New Queen Crowns Mentor At Bushing Feast







ROSE KENTISH is the new monarch of McLaren Vale's winemakers. She was quick to crown her consultant, veteran McLaren Vale winesmith BRIAN LIGHT, for his guidance in the making of her stunning ULITHORNE PATERNUS CABERNET SHIRAZ 2006 which won her the McLaren Vale bushing crown at a gala feast for 600 at Penny's Hill on Friday. As Sam Harrison, her artist husband, and father of her four kids, was surfing at Cactus, on the Great Australian Bight on the day, Rose had no hesitation in sharing her throne with Brian, her good friend and mentor. PHOTOGRAPH by JOHN KRUGER


“My husband’s surfing at Cactus” Rose Kentish royally announced above the cheering mob, the McLaren Vale Bushing crown fresh upon her head. “So my King will be my winemaking mentor”. Up stepped the beaming veteran winesmith and consultant, Brian Light.


Rose had won the annual Vales wine races with The Ulithorne Paternus McLaren Vale Cabernet Shiraz 2006.


Sam Harrison, the surfing husband, is a painter. His parents planted the first 30 acres of contoured vines at Ulithorne, just north of the Onkaparinga Gorge National Park, across the gully from Samuel’s Gorge, in 1971.


The vineyard was planted to absorb the waste from a piggery they’d planned but was wisely disallowed by the Council. Wirra Wirra, then Rosemount, bought the fruit for many years, but the vineyard ran down until Sam the artist and Rose the fashion marketing strategist took over ten years ago, and determinedly set about weaning it off the old synthetic chemicals regime.


Ulithorne’s in the neoproterozoic siltstone which rock doctors call the Tapley Hill formation. This is a sparse, lean remnant of deep still ocean that covered the joint when the ice melted between five and six hundred million years ago. Wherever it coincides with viable viticulture – Greenock Creek; Willunga; Mintaro; east Clare – great wines grow. When it’s capped by limestone and clay, as it is at Ulithorne, even greater things seem possible.


“Sam was passionate about the vineyard”, Rose says, “but he’s more passionate about his painting. One day he got off the tractor and said ‘I can’t drive around in circles any more’, so we bought Bromley’s studio in the old mill on Mill Terrace at Middleton, and sold the vineyard to Tinlins with an ongoing agreement that I can buy whichever parcels of fruit I prefer. So we live in the Mill with our four children, and use it as a cellar sales outlet and studio.”


One might be forgiven for uttering a well-aimed “whew!” at this point, but the wise counsel of consultant Brian Light takes a little pressure off the winemaking side of Rose’s busy life. I first encountered Brian when he made exquisite bargain-priced wine for his Dad Lloyd at Coolawin in the late ’seventies. That fruit grew on the alluvial flats on Baker’s Gully Road west of Kangarilla, between Ulithorne and Yangarra. The Coolawin winery, on the ridge above Clarendon, eventually became Chais Clarendon, then Norman’s, before Tinlins recently bought it and renamed it Fleurieu. Like in politics, everything winy’s connected to everything else, see?


Which brings us to the wine which quite correctly got Rose Kentish her throne. The Ulithorne Paternus McLaren Vale Cabernet Shiraz 2006 ($35; 14.5% alcohol; screw cap; 93+++ points) was selected by the judges of the McLaren Vale wine show at about the time I was writing last week’s column, begging winemakers to consider bolstering and tempering cabernet sauvignon with the varieties the old Bordelaise traditionally blended with it: shiraz, merlot, cabernet franc, malbec, petit verdot and carmenere.


The Paternus has an acrid high tone which actually does smell like the freshly-split flagstone of the Mintaro or Willunga quarries. This is spiced neatly by perfectly unobtrusive, but supportive oak. But it’s what’s below that nose-tickling topnote that counts: opulent, rich, beautifully harmonious prune, fig and mulberry, with just a tease of the lollyshop side of cabernet: musk, marshmallow, raspberry and confectioner’s sugar. Only after all this is the minty nature of cabernet evident.


The palate has that silky viscosity that you’ll find in Moss Wood Margaret River cabernet and some of Julian Castagna’s Beechworth shiraz. I suspect this texture cannot be achieved with standard petrochem vineyard regimes: it’s more like a cordial of perfectly organic fruit. But then the mealy – nay, slatey – tannins emerge with great – nay, royal – authority, more insistent and persistent than Margaret River or Beechworth. More like Bordeaux, in fact. Enough tannin to see this glorious slurp mature and mellow for twenty years beneath the safe reassurance of that screwcap.


Australians blithely claim the cabernet shiraz blend to be their own invention. Last week I explained that the colonist James Busby brought the idea, and the cuttings, home to Australia from France in 1831. If, indeed, there was any improvement to be made to Rose’s exquisite claret, it might involve some of the violets and blueberries of cabernet franc. It needs none of the gunblue of malbec; the shiraz fills that gap. Its natural tannin precludes any need for petit verdot. The soft, gently tarry nature of the shiraz makes merlot unnecessary. Maybe some carmenere would add more poofy perfume – try the Concha y Toro Casillero del Diablo Chile Carmenere 2006 ($14.50; Vintage Cellars; 1st Choice) and you might get my drift. (Carmenere was a popular Bordeaux variety two hundred years ago when they blended it with cabernet franc in Medoc).


But I’m being pompous. Make a booking (0419 040 670), get your plastic down to the Middleton Mill, buy a case of the Paternus – named after Sam’s Dad, the prospective pig farmer - and decide for yourself.
.


This was published in The Independent Weekly on 7 November 2008
.

Cabernet: Pinch The Whole Damn Recipe!

by PHILIP WHITE - This first appeared inThe Independent Weekly on 31 October 2008













In 1831, colonist James Busby (pictured) left Sydney Town for Europe. He encountered a major zap moment upon arriving in the village of Tain, on the Rhone at the foot of the Hermitage hill, the sacred source of shiraz.


“The greatest part of the finest growth”, he wrote of that shiraz, “are sent to Bourdeaux (sic) to mix with the first growths of Claret”. He smuggled this intelligence to Australia with the appropriate vine cuttings: shiraz from the Rhone, and the Bordeaux reds: cabernet sauvignon, malbec and petit verdot. If he also brought merlot, he classified it as melarot, or perhaps merlé d’Espagne.


So Australia had these varieties from its earliest colonial era, and determinedly copied the recipes Busby, and others, pinched from the Old World. Bordeaux had long been the source of the Englishman’s beloved claret, which the Poms struggled to emulate in Australia, for their own tables as much as to topple France from its position as Britain’s major wine supplier, just as they stole tea from China, to plant in their Indian and Ceylonese colonies.


As Bacchus, or whoever manages things agricultural currently reminds us, Australia is a very difficult farm to run. Soon those early winesmiths were deserting the thinner-skinned merlot and malbec, as they were susceptible to hail, moulds and rot. The tougher, thicker-skinned cabernet and shiraz varieties were much easier to grow and blend.


Wine fashions are frustrating in their fickle cycles. When I dropped rock to write wine in the late ’seventies, the new fad was to release reds of a single variety. While this helped us learn the characteristics of the individual types, it also led to a dumb fashion which has almost outlasted lipstick.


Before they added shiraz for its soft strength, the Bordelaise blended their clarets to achieve the most alluring perfume, the most seductive, complex flavours, and the most satisfactory aftertaste. This includes the rude exhalation which we all ignore: that vital combination of the wine’s aroma with the smell of one’s body - and blood, through the thin wet lung tissue - and the food we’ve been ingesting. If this exhalation is pleasurable, we want to keep doing it. The more pleasure, the more we pay.


In the last few weeks I have attended intense cabernet sauvignon tastings on Kangaroo Island, at Clare, and in McLaren Vale. My verdict? I don’t much like it.


Apart from being terribly easy to grow, cabernet almost makes itself. It’s much more difficult to make a good consommé than it is to make a sound, recognisable cabernet. Its thick blue skins, huge pips, and meagre pulp renders a wine which is very deep and attractive of colour, stacked with dry preserving tannins, and exuding a quickly-recognisable perfume, which can all too easily be described as ripe capsicum – roasted ripe capsicum is even better - and blackcurrant. It also contains varying levels of the natural predator deterrent, methoxypyrazine, which is the prominent aroma of many grasses, mints, and tomato leaves. If the grape is fully ripe, and its seed is ready to germinate, this verdant grassy edge diminishes as the berry replaces its sour acid with alluring sugar, and turns blue, to attract those warm little bellies it so recently deterred, and suddenly employ them as incubators.


Given the laziness/greed/ignorance of many growers, and their tendency to over-irrigate, over-crop, and grow stupidly profuse leaf canopies, most of our cabernet is low on the alluring blackcurrant, and the capsicum rarely smells ripe, let alone roasted. We get aromas like weeds, reeds, piss-on-the-nettles, green tea, bay leaf, tomato leaf and whatnot. Deterrents, see? Baygon.


What we have forgotten is that when we filched our vines and recipes from France, their highly evolved system of blending varieties had a vital gastronomic purpose. We rarely bother now to add the beautiful violets and blueberries of cabernet franc, the fleshy, mushroomy, mossy earth and tar of merlot, or the alluring blue-black fruits, deep florals, and polished gunmetal of malbec.


We’re even forgetting how to bolster cabernet with the soulful mulberry and earthy prune of the softer, simpler, stronger shiraz.


Judiciously assembled by a good nose on the blender’s bench, these varieties fill the yawning hole in the middle of most cabernet, and add a whole rainbow of wickedly alluring, tantalising perfumes to its bouquet. The blender can alter the flavour, and tweak the texture, the alcohol, viscosity, acid and tannin, to build a much more gorgeous creature than the thick-skinned, weedy, pippy, zitty cabsav punk which is lazily ceasing to become an attractor.


This is our fault: like dogs, cabernet has succeeded, through its evolution, to train us to breed it. But wine-addicted humans propagate and grow cabernet over such vast areas now that it no longer requires its pips to sprout, so it clocks off before the job’s finished. We should show it a thing or two.

.

Frocking Up

L to R: Rolf Binder of Veritas, Philip White, Chris Ringland and Greenock Creek's Michael Waugh at the Barons of the Barossa 2005 ceremony at which Ringland was made Winemaker of the Year and Waugh viticulturer of the year. Contrary to the bullshit Dan Phillips and Robert Parker spread about Ringers being the Greenock Creek winemaker, Michael was well and truly making the wine. In spite of incredible drought conditions since, he still remains unique in that he will not add water to his musts. PHOTO - LEO DAVIS


I've taken some flak for presumption or silly walks or something for my attire in the photograph above, which was previously posted on DRANKSTER.

I was honoured some years ago to be inducted into the Barons of the Barossa, the philanthropic order of people who the Barons Grand Council believes have made a significant contribution to Barossa life, and the protection of its unique culture. One is a Baron for life.


Just for the record, my citation read thus:

"Philip White is a writer and broadcaster.


"Philip’s first visit to the Barossa, as a journalist, was 25 years ago when he came to write about Yalumba’s radical new computer system for the quarterly IBM magazine.


"Within a few years he was living in a heritage cottage at Dutton, writing what was Australia’s most influential wine column in The National Times. In spite of tasting at the hands of the PR spin-doctors, he claimed to learn more about the wine industry drinking beer with tanker drivers at the top pub in Truro, and he learned a lot more about drinking beers in the old Buick he co-drove with Peter Lehmann in the 1988 Redex Rally.


"Philip was a vital battler for the retention of the precious old shiraz, carignan, cinsault, mataro and grenache vines in the face of the notorious vine pull scheme, and was, behind the scenes, instrumental in forming the Barossa Residents’ Association, which eventually forced the government to put and end to that destruction.


"In the years since, Philip has written passionately and honestly about the Barossa in most of Australia’s major newspapers and many magazines, local and international. His decade broadcasting on the ABC was special for its knowing references to Barossa life, religion and agriculture. His controversial commitment to environmental conservatism in viticulture, the protection of aquifers in the face of deadly salinity, and the preservation of the culture that makes the Barossa unique, is exemplary, tireless, and ongoing."

.

Where's Bubba's Arm?


.









The brilliant new super d'Arries - which were stupidly overlooked in the recent McLaren Vale wine show, lead to a Biblical treatise on the collapse of Kings, empires, morality and the disconnected arm...


d'Arenberg The Coppermine Road McLaren Vale Cabernet Sauvignon 2006
$65; 14.5% alcohol; screw cap; 94++ points
Since Chester Osborne walked away from the modern vineyard sophistry of constant cultivation and petrochemical spraying, and returned to his grandfather’s regime of honest simplicity, he says his best vineyards have taken a huge leap in quality and contentment. If this Coppermine’s any indicator, he’s understating it. This is bloody scrumptious, right royal wine from a truly great year. Perfect oak-derived spice, perfect depth of fruit, perfect varietal perfume (the lollyshop beside the fruiterer) and a divinely elegant, supple palate with a gradual rise of velvet tannin. It does the impossible: satisfies completely and deeply with every sip, and yet makes the drinking arm reach involuntarily for more. It’s so good, it’s almost boring. Seamless, polished, utterly slurpy sin in a simper – it does make me simper. Keep it for at least ten years, or surrender completely to that drinking arm, NOW. And simper. Simper all day long.



d’Arenberg The Ironstone Pressings McLaren Vale Grenache Shiraz Mourvedre 2006
$65; 15% alcohol; screw cap; 94++ points
Some mechanics smell like this. The female 6’2” blonde spanner wranglers from the Crimea who specialise in v-12 Mercs and wear the bri-nylon bib overalls with no tee shirt but sport a greasy yellow rag in the hip pocket and the polished Glock in the chest one, where my Mississippi bro-in-law carried his Bible, before he was mowed down by a drunk, who I reckon was the sheriff’s best friend. Preachers always get shit. You can view ’em on the ’net. The Crimeans, I mean, not the Free Presbyterians. But you make one call; give one detail of your ID and you’re in as much trouble as you are if you stupidly let a dribble of this wickedness slip into you. Just smell it, for Bacchus’s sake, then back off. Devil Juice. You don’t need anything more sensual or sensuous or slithery than the sniff. She’ll be getting off the plane any minute, and then your children will arrange to have you murdered. So, bugger it, you drink a great gulp of it. You can also do this with Krug: just sink a tumbler of the stuff. Use thirst as an excuse. Remi Krug called this “getting Krugged” last time he was game enough to ask me out for a drink, but that was back before the war, and the Krugs are German, and now they got took over by

them damn Frog handbag factory people. Getting ironstoned or pressed doesn’t sound quite so good as getting Krugged, but it sure sounds better than getting handbagged. If you know d’Arry, you wouldn’t want to be getting darenburgered – he always whinges about the price. So swallow your pride, swallow a great greedy guzzle of this and wait for the plane. Count backwards from a hundred, leaving out all the prime numbers and the multiples of seven. I hate seven. Pretend you’re a v-12 and polish your shifter. How you say? Enjoy! Tee-hee! Get her to lock you in the cellar. And it does taste like ironstone. Ain’t that what they make shifter spanners outa? Mercs? Glocks? Bubba, whatever did happen to your arm?

d’Arenberg The Dead Arm Shiraz 2006
$65; 14.5% alcohol; screw cap; 94++ points


Dead Arm? What happened to his arm? Trapped beneath a stillborn twin in the womb? If the writing on his back was five or six points bigger we might find out, but I actually believe, and I’ve got this on really good sniff, that the arm was never there. This is the One Armed Man. He’s an ironmonger who swings his hammer with that one mighty right arm. Underneath the chestnut tree the village smithy stands. The muscles on his mighty arm are tight as iron bands. If you boiled down all the reviews in the SHIRAZ section of this blog, and half of the GRENACHE, fed ’em to your local Bubba – ’Lo, m’name’s Bubba, what’s y’all – got the local deaf reporter to interview everybody in a real deep investigative sense, then got Bubba to eat the shorthand notes, and THEN cut off his arm, you might get this. And they reckon they can teach winemaking in universities. I coulda talked about berries and tannin, acid, for heaven’s sake, and juicy strapping fruit, and Chester finally turning his back on the petrochem sprays and recreational cultivation and the near impossibly ideal conditions of 2006, but you’d still be wondering about whether the guy who never had the arm was an improvement on Bubba after you cut one of his off. And what’d you do with one you cut off? Is that the one that keeps reaching out for more cabernet? Eh? Chester mighta put it in the GSM, but it’s certainly not in the cabernet. So what's all this microscopic rubbish on the back label?

I reckon it’s what the disconnected hand wrote on the wall for Daniel, so Chester shoulda put this on there. He's not Bubba, see? Only Daniel knows who the hand should be connected to. So how can we possibly comprehend these wines?


To start with, we could learn a lot from God’s Word. Let us read from the The Holy Bible, King James Version, The Book Of Daniel, Chapter 5:


Belshazzar the king made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand. Belshazzar, whilst he tasted the wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels which his father Nebuchadnezzar had taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that the king, and his princes, his wives, and his concubines, might drink therein. Then they brought the golden vessels that were taken out of the temple of the house of God which was at Jerusalem; and the king, and his princes, his wives, and his concubines, drank in them. They drank wine, and praised the gods of gold, and of silver, of brass, of iron, of wood, and of stone.


In the same hour came forth fingers of a man's hand, and wrote over against the candlestick upon the plaster of the wall of the king's palace: and the king saw the part of the hand that wrote.


Then the king's countenance was changed, and his thoughts troubled him, so that the joints of his loins were loosed, and his knees smote one against another.


The king cried aloud to bring in the astrologers, the Chaldeans, and the soothsayers. And the king spake, and said to the wise men of Babylon, “Whosoever shall read this writing, and show me the interpretation thereof, shall be clothed with scarlet, and have a chain of gold about his neck, and shall be the third ruler in the kingdom”.


Then came in all the king's wise men: but they could not read the writing, nor make known to the king the interpretation thereof. Then was king Belshazzar greatly troubled, and his countenance was changed in him, and his lords were astonished.


Now the queen, by reason of the words of the king and his lords, came into the banquet house: and the queen spake and said, “O king, live for ever: let not thy thoughts trouble thee, nor let thy countenance be changed: There is a man in thy kingdom, in whom is the spirit of the holy gods; and in the days of thy father light and understanding and wisdom, like the wisdom of the gods, was found in him; whom the king Nebuchadnezzar thy father, the king, I say, thy father, made master of the magicians, astrologers, Chaldeans, and soothsayers; forasmuch as an excellent spirit, and knowledge, and understanding, interpreting of dreams, and showing of hard sentences, and dissolving of doubts, were found in the same Daniel, whom the king named Belteshazzar: now let Daniel be called, and he will show the interpretation”.


Then was Daniel brought in before the king. And the king spake and said unto Daniel, “Art thou that Daniel, which art of the children of the captivity of Judah, whom the king my father brought out of Jewry? I have even heard of thee, that the spirit of the gods is in thee, and that light and understanding and excellent wisdom is found in thee.


“And now the wise men, the astrologers, have been brought in before me, that they should read this writing, and make known unto me the interpretation thereof: but they could not show the interpretation of the thing:


“And I have heard of thee, that thou canst make interpretations, and dissolve doubts: now if thou canst read the writing, and make known to me the interpretation thereof, thou shalt be clothed with scarlet, and have a chain of gold about thy neck, and shalt be the third ruler in the kingdom”.


Then Daniel answered and said before the king, “Let thy gifts be to thyself, and give thy rewards to another; yet I will read the writing unto the king, and make known to him the interpretation ... O thou king, the most high God gave Nebuchadnezzar thy father a kingdom, and majesty, and glory, and honour: and for the majesty that he gave him, all people, nations, and languages, trembled and feared before him: whom he would he slew; and whom he would he kept alive; and whom he would he set up; and whom he would he put down. But when his heart was lifted up, and his mind hardened in pride, he was deposed from his kingly throne, and they took his glory from him: and he was driven from the sons of men; and his heart was made like the beasts, and his dwelling was with the wild asses: they fed him with grass like oxen, and his body was wet with the dew of heaven; till he knew that the most high God ruled in the kingdom of men, and that he appointeth over it whomsoever he will.


“And thou his son, O Belshazzar, hast not humbled thine heart, though thou knewest all this; but hast lifted up thyself against the Lord of heaven; and they have brought the vessels of his house before thee, and thou, and thy lords, thy wives, and thy concubines, have drunk wine in them; and thou hast praised the gods of silver, and gold, of brass, iron, wood, and stone, which see not, nor hear, nor know: and the God in whose hand thy breath is, and whose are all thy ways, hast thou not glorified” ...


Then was the part of the hand sent from him; and this writing was written. And this is the writing that was written, MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN.


This is the interpretation of the thing: MENE; God hath numbered thy kingdom, and finished it. TEKEL; Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting. PERES; Thy kingdom is divided, and given to the Medes and Persians.


Then commanded Belshazzar, and they clothed Daniel with scarlet, and put a chain of gold about his neck, and made a proclamation concerning him, that he should be the third ruler in the kingdom. In that night was Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans slain, and Daniel, the servant of the Lord, rolled in the arms of the Queen, who yea verily was a Mercedes v-12 mechanic from the land of the Crimea.


Now, Chester, there's a back label...