Wine Industry Network calls joint symposium of cannabis, wine and tourism industries
by PHILIP WHITE
"Alcohol
and marijuana, if used in moderation, plus loud, usually low-class music, make
stress and boredom infinitely more bearable."
Kurt Vonnegut
So quotes the
top of the page of the California-based Wine Industry Network's (WIN)
announcement that it will host an intensive one-day Wine and Weed Symposium in
August at Santa Rosa in Sonoma.
The meeting is
"dedicated to the legalization of cannabis and the impact on the wine
industry."
California's a
touch ahead of South Australia in the cannabis business, but we're wending, as
they say, our way along.
While most Oz
newshounds were transfixed by the astonishing political chaos in the US
Presidency, South Australian Manufacturing Minister Kyam Maher quietly called a
round table meeting for the end of this month where "industry groups and
companies looking to make things like medicinal cannabis, building products,
clothing, textiles and skin care products" will get together to discuss
the viability of "creating an industry".
"We want to
look at what barriers we can remove to the industry and then it will really be
up to the market forces to decide whether this crop is a viable and sustainable
crop in South Australia," Mr Maher said.
"Viable?"
"Sustainable?" He's gotta be joking.
The Sonoma
symposium arises from a one-hour session WIN ran at its wine conference in
Santa Rosa last month.
Rather than kick
off as enemies, California's cannabis and wine industries are keen to work
together on their commonalities, "from agriculture and terroir to legal,
financial and distribution regulations."
"People
have been questioning the impact that this is going to have on the wine
industry for a long time," said George Christie, WIN president. "This
is an opportunity to learn from the experts, the cost of entry and what is and
is not allowed. We plan to provide a better understanding of the inevitable
competition for consumer attention and how best to prepare for what’s coming
and what new opportunities might exist."
Back in
Adelaide, Industrial Hemp Association of South Australia president Teresa
McDowell voiced optimism that the Government would "move forward with
regulatory reforms ... If you look at places like Canada, their hemp seed and
oil alone export market last year, to September, was $114 million," she
said.
"There are
various different industries that industrial hemp can move towards: there are
composite materials, automobile composites and bio fuels."
DRINKSTER takes definitions by the master, D. J. Mabberly, from his Mabberly's Plant Book (Third edition, Cambridge 2009)
No mention of
the possibility of your, er, actual intoxication in any of the South Australian
public discussion, note. Even government's recent licensing of two medicinal opiate farms in the Riverland wine region went largely un-noticed.
Industrial hemp, meanwhile, is not for smoking stoners, although
wartime sailors have been known to smoke rope.
It appears that
some level of intoxication is a given in the California equation.
There, experts
from both the wine and cannabis industries will join Tawnie Logan, Executive
Director of the Sonoma County Growers Alliance, to discuss California's new
recreational cannabis laws, their regulations and licensing requirements, and
their relationship with hospitality, tourism, and farming.
"The
cannabis and wine industries have more in common than what one might see at
first glance," the WIN announcement continues. "Both are based in
rural areas with a major emphasis on agriculture and quality. Place of origin
and American Viticulture Area is important in both categories.
"Other
topics include growing cannabis in vineyards, cannabis and wine hospitality,
learning from wineries in states where cannabis is legal, cannabis infused
wine, the banking industry and what wine regions can expect in the coming
years.
"To a
significant degree, they share a common consumer and will be overseen by the
same government agency. Like the wine industry, the cannabis industry will also
be heavily regulated and because of that, will experience tremendous overlap
with regard to legal, financial, compliance and distribution regulations.
"Both will
compete for visitor attention and dollars in California’s most notable wine
regions like Sonoma, Napa, Mendocino, Lake, Humboldt, San Luis Obispo, Paso
Robles, Lodi Santa Barbara and Santa Cruz counties, the Sierra Foothills and
more."
This California
advancement was to be expected. For years the cannabis media has reported and
reviewed marijuana-steeped wines, many of the hippy/neo-Mennonite variety, some
more secretively made by respected established winemakers.
Professional
outdoor cannabis growers are becoming very serious indeed about terroir,
generally making much more precise scientific studies of their site selection
than most of the wine industry has ever considered.
Winemakers and
viticulturers can learn from these people.
In their
marketing, too, US cannabis industry researchers have shown wine scientists
their heels in matters like the medicinal influences of the vital efficaceous cannabis terpenes which are also common to much red wine. Are our
Ĺ“nologists embarrassed that some of the most prominent health-promoting
components of their product also occur in cannabis?
In Adelaide,
we're still tolerating police raids on folks like Jenny Hallam, who was
supplying around 100 patients with medicinal cannabis extracts she'd been
making from donated pot. She has never charged her customers and now awaits
further news from the courts.
Jenny had been
expecting a visit. She told the police there was cannabis and cannabis oil on
her premises, used only to treat people who are sick and dying and that
anything the officers removed could result in someone's death.
She has not been
invited to Minister Mayer's meeting. It seems he'd prefer to follow "the
best possible expert medical and scientific advice on those pathways."
in any contentious issue of plant nomenclature and clarification DRINKSTER goes straight to the astonishing Mabberly's Plant Book (Third edition, Cambridge 2009)
Perhaps it's
time we advanced sufficiently to also take the advice of extant practitioners,
an embrace the California wine people obviously have no hesitation in making.
There are
precedents. The South Australian government has taken very serious advice from
California wine leaders before. The essential 2012 Character Preservation
Legislations (McLaren Vale and Barossa) which have put a halt to further urban
intrusion into these vital agricultural and wine tourism provinces were very
much steered by what Agriculture and Tourism Minister Leon Bignell learned from
the planning authorities he visited in the Napa Valley.
If Minister
Mayer is seriously keen to remove barriers perhaps he should be planning with
the Agriculture/Tourism Minister an official visit to the WIN Wine and Weed
Symposium in August.
The principal barriers,
it seems, are his blinkers.
Bring on the
market forces.
the first front cover of The Pennsylvania Gazette under the ownership of Benjamin Franklin
No comments:
Post a Comment