We already fought this war!
Hey, hey TCA: how many
wines did you spoil today?
by PHILIP WHITE
There's a lot of excited popping around the cork business lately. The
bark merchants can smell money.
Because China still thinks wine is a quaint and old fashioned luxury, its
merchants and sommeliers insist on wine being corked. Many Australian
winemakers who have been entirely happy with screwcaps but are keen to sell
wine in China are suddenly having to remember how to phone the blokes who sell the
old Portuguese bark plugs.
Small premium producers who don't have the volumes to justify bottling
under both closures, to offer customers a choice, are finding themselves hoping
that Australian wine lovers who have become accustomed to the convenience and
reliability of screwcap will suddenly overlook their return to cork. The new
Chinese agent wants cork; everybody's gotta have cork.
This is on the nose.
In China, it don't matter a fig that the screwcap keeps wine fresher
longer. Being heavily influenced by the French, who don't mind a bit of tish, the
poor buggers are impressed by that smelly, suss little scrap of old-fashioned
western ritual.
I hate corks. Sure, I've loved and recommended many wines that came
plugged with them, but it's no secret that I've encouraged the march to better,
more scientifically proven closures for thirty-five years. I thought this
battle had been won.
I suspect the quality of cork shipped to Australia may have improved
slightly in recent years. But I can't forget the days when a case of wine would
typically contain three good bottles, three that tasted vaguely disappointing,
three that were simply flat and not good, and three that were rotten with the
perfectly named contaminant, 2,4,6-trichloroanisole. Winemakers have conveniently abbreviated this to the prettier-sounding TCA. As if we needed another TLA*.
This delight is matched only by the
aptly-named butylated hydroxyanisole, which is that rancid stink of the fat
that launched a thousand chips.
The health police eventually imposed rigid
limits on the permitted amounts of butylated hydroxyanisole in fish'n'chip shop
fat, but winemakers flatly denied their 2,4,6-trichloroanisole rip-off rate,
and expected nobody to notice. And they were ripping us off. It was a rip-off.
They are capable of ripping their customers off. They were dragged kicking and
screaming into the world of screw don't pull. Now they're sending corked wine
to China.
My readers deserve better: in my
day-to-day tasting, anything with a cork and its associated suss goes straight
to the end of the line. When I announced my new tasting protocol in The Advertiser in 1990, reading
winemakers began to realise the game may have been up.
I couldn't be confident that the corked wine I recommended was much like the bottle my reader bought.
To recap: for decades Australia has made wine so clean and sanitary and
stable, using shiny stainless steel, that it is always put in brand new
bottles. Rather than wash them for refilling, we use vast amounts of energy to melt
the bottles down and blow new ones in order to store the wine in the scientific
food-grade sanctity it deserves.
Then we get a piece of bark from a tree in Portugal and bash it down the
throat of the perfectly clean brand new bottle full of perfectly clean brand new
wine.
The spongiform nature of natural corks makes each one a five-star
high-rise for microbes, germs and minibugs of all sorts. Think of your cork oak
there in Portugal: squirrel piss; birdshit; bulls scratching their quaking arses before
the bullfight. Peel the bark off, bleach it to make it look better, bash it in
your bottle and you get the reaction that produces that carrion anisole twang.
Back to natural cork makes about as much sense as returning to the
natural wine skin. Now that's a lovely heritagey idea: a new market for all our
feral pigs and goats!
Our blokes are obviously not explaining these issues to the good clean
people of China. I mean they'll come home sniggering about how the poor Asians
are still putting Coke in their red, but they'll have no qualms about flogging
them container after container of plonk with bark plugs. I'd probably have Coke
in my red too if I was on the receiving end of that.
Coke, just by the way, used to have a little cork wafer under its cap.
For all the right reasons, like those listed above, they rejected cork in the
'sixties. The product suddenly improved. Imagine Coke "going back to
natural cork"?
I heard a cork flogger preaching his gospel at a tasting last week: like
dozens of cork floggers before him have preached for decades, he
promised that any day soon the problems of cork would be over. Just like that. It's
coming. Somebody's always inventing some new plastic coating or prophylactic sandwich or
something, giving these proselytisers fresh chapters to preach. But anybody not selling them knows that a cork is still a frigging cork.
Everything about cork is corky. You can't put a natural cork in a bottle
without the cork influencing the flavour and aroma of the wine. The damned
things may have worked to a more tolerable extent when you had a jeeves or a
Denholm Elliot or somebody subservient in the next room getting his toolbox out
to remove the bark plug, test the wine, discretely tip it out if it was too corky,
or decant it and present it to your table if it seemed vaguely okay.
Corks might even be slightly more acceptable when your wine waiter does
all that for you in the restaurant you like to attend because you can't afford
servants at home but here you can pretend for a while that suddenly you can.
Now we have wine bar staff who refuse to use corkscrews: they've never needed
them because they love the immediacy and reliable safety of the screwie,
Bacchus bless 'em.
Even the Portuguese sardine fishermen realised decades ago that if you
want your customers to eat all these fish you catch, you can't expect them to
carry round a special spanner to get the fish out of the tin. So first they
gave us the key, now they give us the flip-top tin. The idea of having to carry
a corkscrew round in your handbag in case you get thirsty is just plain old
codswallop.
And the idea of wrapping a cork in a plastic franger to make it more sanitary, then selling it as natural, also beggars belief.
“The quality issues with natural cork in the early 2000s
meant Australian winemakers had no choice but to seek alternatives to cork for
their wines,” a press release from a cork mob advised me today.
“SmartCork, with its low failure rate and its ability to
consistently deliver fresh, intense and fruity wines, now gives them the
opportunity to return to natural cork with confidence.
“In time we hope to see membrane-coated corks accepted as
the closure of choice in Australia.”
Closure of choice? You know where you can put that.
*TLA: three-letter acronym
4 comments:
Phillip, I was at that same tasting, and that same cork flogger had already grabbed me, and bent my ear earlier.
What a load of codswallop ... but, that winery at the tasting has now gone back to corks.
Retrograde step!
1. we like the 'pop'
2. made for market
3. You are the minority even if you are right :)
1. pop away ... just don't muck it up for Australia
2. Coke is market sensitive, which is why it disposed of cork when I was at high school
3. Einstein was a minority.
"I served with Jack Kennedy. I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy."
- Lloyd Bentsen
Post a Comment