River Heaven gets Hellishly dry
Tumbleweed back on the menu
We coulda thought this through
by PHILIP WHITE
It's Ground Hog Day. Every summer now, the minute the radios
cease keeping us awake playing Silent Night the winegrape growers of the
Murray Mallee begin a great howl of grief about their rattly future.
They rarely look at their
past. Let's face it. 250,000 Australian
servicemen and women returned from World War I to find that most of the jobs filled
by men before the war were now taken by women, who cost half as much. Add to
that the shellshock, the jitters, the illnesses and the onset of the Great
Depression, and you have a twisty challenge for politicians addicted to the
opiate of power through re-election.
After WWI, we had only
four million people, total. A quarter of
a million votes was a goldmine for the cunning powermonger.
What they did was
inspired, but tragically ill-researched.
To fill up the great empty spaces in the hinterland with easily-managed
electorates, they sold troops cheap blocks and encouraged them to plant crops.
By 1915, South Australia alone had allocated 11,247 square kilometres of
country for 3,240 settlement farms.
Berri, Waikerie, Cadell,
Renmark, Cobdogla, Chaffey ... all these arid locations were sliced up and
allocated to blokes who were encouraged to use water out of the Murray to grow
grapes, fruit, vegetables and cattle for milk or meat.
This was a lot cheaper and
easier than offering the buggered troops proper psychological support as part
of a thorough debriefing/rehabilitation regime.
It was also cheaper, easier and quicker than conducting a little science
to work out what the Mallee can honestly grow for real profits, ongoing.
After World War II,
another 350,000 soldiers were discharged, and the pattern was repeated, adding
Loxton to what we delightfully call the Riverland, as if it were the French
Riviera.
Mallee grape-growing was
always an up-and-down business.
Initially, this was largely for dried table fruit. Kids ate Sultanas at school, just as we drank
free milk. When we couldn't possibly eat
any more "Tanas", this fruit went to fortified wine or brandy.
Politicians taxed the huge brandy business
into oblivion in the 'seventies, so the white grapes that had gone into the
stills suddenly became white wine, although the technology for sound and stable
white had barely evolved.
All this happened without
any real research into varieties which made premium wine in arid land. Thanks to the ebullience of the Chardonnay
evangelist, Len Evans, Chardonnay and Semillon replaced much of the Sultana by
the mid-eighties. To be honest, much of
the bulk Chardonnay and Semillon was
pretty much indiscernible from the Sultana wine anyway.
But then the Chardonnay grape had come from
Champagne and Burgundy, where there is much higher background humidity than the
Australian Mallee, and it also, er, snows.
Semillon came from
Bordeaux, whose climate very roughly resembles Tasmania or the bottom corner of
Western Australia. Like, it'll, er, snow. Apart from
over-rated, blinged-out, hard-to-find Semillons from Evans' beloved Hunter
Valley, which is sub-tropical, Semillon is second only to Chardonnay in tonnes produced up the Mallee (which is arid). But we're just as likely to see Semillon as the word
Sultana on the bladder packs which contain it. Like not.
For the ideal
desert-friendly red grape, the CSIRO at Mildura crossed Sultana with Touriga
Nacional, the noble Oporto grape, to make Tarrango, which few took seriously, other than the late Stephen Hickinbotham, who used it to
make his slurpy Cab Mac in the early 'eighties.
Generations of politicians
have enjoyed playing with Murray Valley voters by pleasing them with gentler
taxation of very cheap wines, and manipulating their rights to water,
regardless of how much water there actually was. At the
same time, they play with the votes of drinkers all over the rest of Australia
by keeping the price of bladder packs artificially low. The Wine Equalisation Tax ensures that
higher-quality, more expensive wines are priced artificially high.
Bladder packs comprise
nearly half the wine made in Australia; most of them come from the Mallee.
Their contents are on a par with the thousands of huge bladder packs now standard for export: one bag per shipping container, pumped full and bloody shipped, mate. Bottled in bloody Blighty, mate. Ew.
Now the annual sackcloth
and ashes wailing has begun. 2014 will
be the fifth vintage in a row where most of them won't make a profit, in spite
of all this nonsense about tax and water and the billions spent on gabfests up
and down the Big Rivers. Not to mention the
actual subsidising of some electorates, with taxpayer-funded pipes and channels.
The mantra seems to be "if you can't give 'em more water, make it easier
for 'em to get."
In the meantime, the big
wine refineries have advised Riverland growers that their 2014 crop will bring
even lower prices than last year, when they were already way below the cost of
production.
Last week, ABC Rural
reporter Sallese Gibson suggested "farm gate income in the Riverland could
plunge $27 million this year."
Grower Jack Papageorgiou
told Gibson "If indications out there what they are showing, nobody's
going to survive. It's going to be pretty tough ... not just for the grape
growers, it's going to be getting tough for our small business and the
Riverland economy ... what we need to be sitting down with winemakers and say
'OK, enough is enough; we need clear direction.' Where do we sit as grape
growers for their future requirements?"
Given the history, and the
politics, the answer's simple.
If you want to see the
future of your relationship, look at its past.
The refineries' future
requirement, given the quality of the fruit in this enormous ill-founded
adventure, will be ever-increasing amounts of grapes whose price does a magic plunge, consistently, every year.
And regardless of the Abbott regime's
confounding attitudes, cutting irrigators' costs by providing cheaper water is
a tricky business when there's not enough water in the River.
Especially when we return
to the normal drought.
The executive director of
Wine Grape Growers Australia, Lawrie Stanford, told the ABC the problem is
simple: Australia is still producing too much wine.
It's breath-taking. Endless haphazard attempts to keep the region
alive by soft wine taxes, irrigation system subsidies and impossibly cheap
water never rate a mention. And there's
a cruel multiplier in the health and violence issues and incredible hidden
costs in the abuse of this artificially cheap wine.
What Stanford most
noticeably failed to say was that despite all these taxpayer-funded prop-ups,
arid Australia produces too much low quality fruit in a world increasingly
interested in better, finer, wine.
Wine which requires less
irrigation per unit; wine which returns more dollars and jobs per unit to the
communities which grow it. Wine which, in spite of the scandalous tax system,
is already more profitable.
So what'll happen? When the refineries discover the true tonnage
of the 2014 crop - and it's going to be down sixteen per cent in McLaren Vale,
for example, or down one whole third - they may find a few extra cents per tonne for the odd exceptional
Mallee grower, especially if they have a new variety ending in O. We may even
see a percentage of bladder pack fruit going instead into bottles, where it'll
masquerade as better wine.
But if Mr Abbott has a
sudden burst of consistency and applies his car industry attitude to irrigated viticulture
in the desert, and lets the market rule, then I guarantee that within a few
years our cheapest wine will be coming from China, which has announced it will
double its grape harvest in five years.
China is already far and
away the world's biggest grape-grower, to which most Riverlanders will respond
"but they're table grapes!"
China, however, is very determinedly pursuing a dead-serious premium
wine industry, and there's plenty of snow and water on the Tibetan Plateau to outgrow
anything Australia can manage.
Besides, we know from
history that table grapes make the sort of wine that many Australians love to
guzzle from the cosy old silver pillow. As long as they're cheap.
6 comments:
how many hours of 46+C will fry that surplus whitey?
I am interested in purchasing large volumes of minimal-to-zero irrigation Tarrango from bush vines of 35+ years of age FROM AN ARID/BORDERLINE VINEYARD.
Pls advise:
Felicity
[for]
Sydney Tidemouth OBE MW
Oporto
What is it you object to exactly? not everyone has wine sent to their door gratis. Some people only drink what they can afford, which sometimes is a cask of wine. Winemakers, mostly good interesting folk. The growers, even better people. Wine critics for some reason believe what they do is important, be aware that no one reads wine reviews. I've been in and out of the industry for 20 years and I can barely bring myself to read them
So you have one tiny cluster of brain cells still devoted to reading wine criticism, and you spend it all on DRINKSTER? Wise person! And humble modesty ... my goodness. You cannot bring yourself to tell us who you are.
Hi Whitey, I think he is "Frustrated of Tunbridge Wells" I've read his ramblings previously in the Gruniad
Anonymous #2 –
whether you are a grower, winemaker, politician or industry figure, and take the time to follow this blog, you cannot become impatient with, or ignore what it means by way of comment - that the future is framed by the past. Don’t be resentful of wine critics who also care for the health of the industry. There may be tough times ahead for the Riverland growers and winemakers, but that will not be made easier by studied neglect. However long it takes, the Riverland could use a unique varietal style that suits the conditions, and is grown and made with economic and environmental cleverness. It is Tarrango? Who knows? But is has to be something that does not simply ape other varietals grown more effectively elsewhere, or follow short term sales trends. Growers and winemakers, organise while you can, figure it out and take it to the world.
Post a Comment